|
发表于 2016-7-11 21:28:23
|
显示全部楼层
Conversation One
M: Have you heard about the too-pretty-to-work case on TV? A girl who is very pretty is actually fired by her employer. Can you believe that?
W: That’s really weird. By law, one can’t be fired for his or her appearance. Employers can’t fire someone based on race, gender, age or disabilities.
M: But, that happens frequently in our workplace. If one female employee’s clothes are too revealing, and her boss doesn’t like it, she’ll be somehow fired.
W: There’s no accounting for tastes. But, it’s illegal to do that, firing someone for inappropriate clothes. I guess, there’re many similar cases like that.
M: That’s for certain. It’s unacceptable in the eyes of some employers if one’s too attractive. But, being ugly is also not good by some employers’ standard.
W: By the same line of reasoning, being too fat may also be a problem.
M: That’s true. Employers refuse to hire or promote overweight people because of their body weight, especially overweight women.
W: If that happens, those employers can also be criticized for their discrimination against women, not only for their illegal discrimination based on body weight.
M: Other cases may open your eyes further. I have been told three times that someone is fired for his shoes, for being too short, and even for being too young.
W: Wow, how can we deal with these sorts of discrimination? Maybe, it’s advisable for us to ask help from an employment lawyer before starting to hunt for a job.
Questions 9 to 11 are based on the conversation you have just heard.
9. What has law said about employers’ firing employees?
10. Why are overweight women more likely to be fired than overweight male employees?
11. What’s the woman’s suggestion to one who’s facing workplace discrimination?
Conversation Two
W: Cycling in modern cities is very dangerous. A cyclist may run into traffic accidents and get seriously hurt. However, cycling has many potential plus points.
M: As far as I know, the increase in the number of people who cycle, rather than drive, could not only reduce air pollution and green gas emissions, but also lower people’s risk of developing a number of diseases.
W: Besides that, many studies in Copenhagen also found positive benefits of cycling. They found people who did not cycle to work experienced a 39% higher death rate than those who did. In other words, cycling extends people’s life span.
M: That’s true. But, as you mentioned just now, cycling through heavy traffic may be rather dangerous. The question is, how can large cities do to make cycling safer and more attractive to people.
W: The first idea occurring to me is that large cities have to do some work on urban design and relevant policies.
M: I heard European cities like Paris have done a lot in these fields, to make cycling safe. Though many of the streets in Paris are centuries old, and comparatively speaking, very narrow, bike lanes have been prominently planned and marked. Although some lanes are often crazily disconnected, disappearing and appearing again in a seemingly random, it can be seen that Paris has achieved much in urban design.
W: How about relevant policies in Paris? Are there policies established in favor of cycling?
M: Yes, Paris did very well in this aspect. For example, by law, cars are required to drive under a speed limit of 30 kph. Otherwise, the driver will be fined heavily for speeding. It makes cyclists feel much safer, even cycling close to cars on the road.
Questions 12 to 15 are based on the conversation you have just heard.
12. What’s the dangerous side of cycling in modern cities?
13. What can cycling help our environment?
14. What’s true about bike lanes in Paris?
15. What policy does Paris adopt for the benefit of cyclists?
|
|