|
|
我们经常在看美剧或者口语中看见这三个词汇Gonna, Gotta, Wanna，今天我们就讲解一下这三个词汇的用法，大家一起来学习一下吧~
Although not hearing impaired, I watch television with captions enabled. I
like to see how words are spelled and how the running text differs from what is
actually said by the actors and presenters. When I began to notice a frequency
of the spelling gonna for “going to,” I decided to do a little research.
I discovered that gonna has an entry in the OED:
gonna: colloquial (especially U.S.) or vulgar pronunciation of “going
to.”
Not only gonna, but wanna, gotta,and shoulda also have entries in OED,
although they do not appear in Merriam-Webster.
Gonna, gotta and wanna are not contractions.
Contractions are shortenings like aren’t and can’t. The missing letters
have been replaced by an apostrophe, and the original words are discernible in
the contraction.
Contractions are acceptable in all but the most formal writing. Here are a
few standard contractions:
aren’t = are not
can’t = cannot
couldn’t =could not
didn’t = did not
doesn’t = does not
don’t = do not
hadn’t = had not
hasn’t = has not
haven’t = have not
he’d = he had, he would
he’ll = he will, he shall
he’s = he is
I’d = I had, I would
I’ll = I will, I shall
I’ve = I have
isn’t = is not
it’s = it is
let’s = let us
The spellings gonna, gotta,and wanna, on the other hand, do not preserve
the shape of the words they represent. They are not contractions, but
reductions.
A linguistic reduction is the result of relaxed pronunciation. Nearly all
speakers of all languages slur sounds and words together. Doing so is a normal
part of spoken language. The more informal the situation, the more slurring goes
on.
Speakers who are sensitive to the needs of others will speak more carefully
in some situations than in others. For example, teenagers who barely move their
lips when speaking to one another maybe expected to enunciate in the
classroom.
Courteous native speakers will take the trouble to pronounce words
carefully when speaking to non-native speakers. Any English speaker who has
received a formal education of ten years or more may be expected to speak
clearly when being interviewed on television.
Reductions are not unknown in print. Novelists have long spelled out
whatcha and couldain dialogue in order to convey a character’s attributes. Until
recently, however, such spellings were not commonly seen outside of fiction.
Gonna and gottaare not unexpected in song lyrics and on social media like
Facebook, but now they are creeping into news coverage. Here are some examples
from transcript sand quotations that have appeared on news sites:
“He’s gonna get to the bottom of what happened at the Fort Hood shooting.”“
I have no doubt she’s gonna run,” says Black. “We’re gonna try to construct a
bipartisan bill.”
Reductions heard in speech are not particularly jarring, but when they
appear in print, they scream “Ignorant!” Unless a journalist desires to present
a senator in a negative light, “going to” is a better choice than gonna, even in
a direct quotation.
Professional writers especially might be expected to avoid nonstandard
usage and spelling, but the evidence on Amazon is that for many authors, gonna,
gotta, wanna, and even whatcha and coulda are acceptable written English.
Here’sa sampling of book titles:
Dude, You’re Gonna BE a Dad!
10 Things You Gotta Know About Choosing a College
I Wanna Iguana (This one is the title of a children’s book.)
Whatcha Gonna Do with that Duck?
Coulda Been a Cowboy
Time will be the judge. An grammar search shows that the use of gonna in
printed books has risen dramatically since the 1960s,and gotta and wanna are
making a little progress.
It’s possible that these words will become acceptable in Standard English
one day. Meanwhile, their use does not reflect well on writers who wish to be
taken seriously.
230_140929165614RsbzFRNzC20hL4J7.jpg
微信号：testcrackers(←长按复制)
推荐理由：一线TOEFL、IELTS、GAMT考试培训资料。教师课件。最新出国留学考试咨询发布，英语听力口语学习、背单词~
|
|
发表于 2016-7-9 22:42:10