英语学习论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 306|回复: 2

2006年3月高级口译真题(2)

[复制链接]

36万

主题

36万

帖子

109万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1094809
发表于 2016-7-11 16:57:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  SECTION 2: READING TEST
  Directions: In this section you will read several passages. Each one is followed by several questions about it. You are to choose ONE best answer, (A), (B), (C) or (D), to each question. Answer all the questions following each passage on the basis of what is stated or implied in that passage and write the letter of the answer you have chosen in the corresponding space in your ANSWER BOOKLET.
  Questions 1-5
  Pupils at GCSE are to be allowed to abandon learning traditional "hard" science, including the meaning of the periodic table, in favour of"soft" science such as the benefits of genetic engineering and healthy eating. The statutory requirement for pupils to learn a science subject will be watered down under a new curriculum introduced next year. There will be no compulsion to master the periodic table--the basis of chemistry--nor basic scientific laws that have informed the work of all the great scientists such as Newton and Einstein. The changes, which the government believes will make science more "relevant" to the 21st century, have been attacked by scientists as a "dumbing down" of the subject. In June the government had to announce financial incentives to tackle a shortage of science teachers. Academics have estimated that a fifth of science lessons are taught by teacherswho are not adequately qualified.
   Most children now study for the double-award science GCSE, which embraces elements of biology, chemistry and physics. This GCSE will be scrapped and ministers have agreed that from next year all 14-year-olds will be required to learn about the general benefits and risks of contemporary scientific developments, in a new science GCSE. A harder science GCSE will also be introduced as an optional course. One expert involved in devising the new system believes it will halve the number of state school pupils studying "hard" science. Independent schools and more talented pupils in the state sector are likely to shun the new papers in favour of the GCSEs in the individual science disciplines of physics, chemistry and biology. These will continue to require pupils to achieve an understanding of scientific principles.
  The new exams were devised after proposals by academics at King's College London,who told ministers that science lessons were often "dull and boring" and required pupils to recall too many facts. Their report said: "Contemporary analyses of the labour market suggest that our future society will need a larger number of individuals with a broader understanding of science both for their work and to enable them to participate as citizens in a democratic society."
  However, Professor Colin Blakemore, chief executive of the Medical Research Council, warned that reducing the "hard" science taught in schools would create problems. "I can understand the government's motives," he said. "There is a crisis of public confidence in science which is reducing the progress of policy on such issues as nuclear energy and stem cell research. But sixth-formers are already arriving at university without the depth of knowledge required." Others endorse the new approach. Results at North Chadderton upper school in Oldham--~3ne of 80 schools piloting the new "softer" GCSE, named 21st Century Science---have improved. Martyn Overy, the head of science, said: "The proportion getting higher grades in science went up from 60% to 75%. The course kept their interest, had more project work and was more relevam."
  As part of their course, the pupils studied what kind of food they needed to keep fit and healthy. Critics say it is only marginally more demanding than following the advice of Nigella Lawson, the television chef who promotes the benefits of eating proper meals instead of snacking from the fridge. Some science teachers are skeptical. Mo Afzai, head of science at the independent Warwick school, said: "These changes will widen the gap between independent and state schools. Even the GCSE that is designed for those going on to A-level science is not as comprehensive as the test it replaces." John Holman, director of the National Science Learning Centre at York University, who advised the government on the content of the new system, said: "The new exam is not dumbing down. The study of how science works is more of a challenge than rote learning."
                           SCIENCE LESSONS
                 Out                    In
                 Periodic table           The drugs debate
                 Ionic equations          Slimming issues
                 Structure of the atom     Smoking and health
                 Bovle's law             IVF treatment
                 Ohm's law              Nuclear controversy
            
            
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6910

帖子

1万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
14316
发表于 2016-7-11 18:37:10 | 显示全部楼层


  1. The phrase "watered down" in the sentence "The statutory requirement for pupils to learn a science subject will be watered down under a new curriculum introduced next year." (para. 1) can best be replaced by which of the following?
   (A) removed completely (B) reduced much in force
   (C) revised greatly (D) reinforced to a certain extent
  2. Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?
   (A) The government had to use financial incentives to attract more science teachers.
   (B) Some of the secondary school science teachers are not adequately qualified.
   (C) The new science GCSE will include the benefits and risks of contemporary scientific developments.
   (D) A harder science GCSE will also be introduced as a compulsory course.
  3. What is Professor Blakemore's opinion about the new requirement of science GCSE?
   (A) He fully appreciates the government's motives in revising GCSE science courses.
   (B) He holds that most students entering university have mastered enough science knowledge as needed.
   (C) He argues that reducing the requirement for "hard" science in schools will lead to more problems.
   (D) He thinks that lack of public confidence in science will not affect the progress of science policy.
  4. The results at North Chadderton upper school piloting the new "softer" GCSE have shown that ____
   (A) the new "softer" GCSE has proved quite successful
   (B) the science examination is much easier than the previous ones
   (C) the new course is most relevant to students' daily life
   (D) most students have achieved average grades in science
  5. When the critics cite the example of television chef Nigella Lawson in their comment, their purpose is
   (A) to advise students to get rid of snacking from the fridge
   (B) to compare that new "softer" GCSE with the television show of cooking
   (C) to show that the new course is not more difficult to follow than the chef's advice
   (D) to illustrate the significance and benefits of eating proper meals
  Questions 6-10
   Andrew Motion, the poet laureate, and Lord Smith, the former culture secretary, have launched a campaign to stem the flow of famous writers' archives being sold to universities in America. They are leading a 15-strong group of eminent literary figures demanding tax breaks, government funding and lottery cash to help British institutions match the bids of their rich American rivals. The campaign comes amid fears that the papers of Salman Rushdie, Zadie Smith and Kazuo Ishiguro, author of The Remains of the Day, may go abroad. All three are understood to have been approached recently by agents acting for institutions in America.
   In recent years British authors whose papers have been sold abroad include the novelists Peter Ackroyd, Julian Barnes and Malcolm Bradbury and the playwrights David Hare and Tom Stoddard. The works of JM Barrie, the writer of Peter Pan, Graham Greene,  D.H. Lawrence and Evelyn Waugh are already held abroad. In 1997, a year before his death, Ted Hughes, the late poet laureate, sold his archive for about ~500,000 to Emory University 'in Atlanta.While taxpayers may be happy to fund purchases of famous paintings so that they remain in the country and be put on show, it is less clear what the immediate benefit would be in paying for authors' archives to be kept here.
  Adrian Sanders, a Liberal Democrat member of the Commons culture select committee, said public money should be spent on "more pressing" projects. "The fact that archives such as this go abroad is, I'm afraid, the reality of the world," he said, "We have many artifacts in the UK that belong to other cultures." The campaign argues, however, that valuable research sources are being lost. Foreign institutions sometimes charge for access to the material and, as the authors retain copyright, the papers cannot be made available on the internet.
  "This is about our cultural heritage as well as the obvious research opportunities, said Motion, whose campaign group includes Michael Hohoyd, the biographer and former president of the Royal Society of Literature, and Richard Ovenden, keeper of special collections at Oxford University. They are calling for the culture secretary to be given the authority to delay the export of items considered a significant part of the national heritage to enable British institutions to put together bids. The campaigners want an increase in direct grants and the removal of Vat from unbound papers, which increases the cost of purchases in this country.
       Smith, who was culture secretary from 1997-2001, said: "It won't cost the Treasury an arm and a leg--we're talking pennies, really." The campaigners say American universities are targeting young British writers and offering between ~50,000 and ~300,000 for their of notebooks, manuscripts and letters. Joan Winterkorn, a broker who negotiated the sale of the papers of Laurence Olivier and the writers Kenneth Tynan and Peter Nichols to the British Library, said the cream of British archive material will continue to be "up for grabs" unless the tax laws are changed.  "American universities are increasingly creating a working relationship with younger and younger writers, so this is not something that is going to go away," she said.
       It is understood that an academic from one American institution was flown to London this month with a specific brief to "hobble" ishiguro at the Booker prize dinner in London. Ishiguro, 50, who was nominated for his novel Never Let Me Go and who won the Booker in 1989 for The Remains of the Day, has not yet made a decision, according to his spokeswoman. She said he had been approached by a number of US universities. Arnold Wesker, best known for his plays Roots and Chips with Everything, sold three tons of letters, manuscripts and papers to an American university in 2000. "1 was offered a derisory £60,000 from the British Library and ~100,000 from the University of Texas at Austin--there was no contest," said Wesker, 73. "1 would much sooner have had my work here in London but the gap was too large ... it is a shame."
       A source close to Rushdie, whose papers stretch back to the publication of his first novel, Grimus, in 1975, said he had received "scores" of approaches from America. The author, who now lives mainly in New York, said this weekend that he had "no immediate plans" to sell his archive. Were he to sell abroad, it is likely that there would be a public outcry given the amount of taxpayers' money spent on his protection following the Satanic Verses affair. Zadie Smith, the author of White Teeth, which won the Whitbread award in 2000, has also received "several approaches from buyers," according to a friend. The University of Texas at Austin spends an estimated ~3m a year on its collections. It specializes in British and lrish writers and includes the papers of George Bernard Shaw, James Joyce and Edith Sitwell among its possessions.
            
            
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6910

帖子

1万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
14316
发表于 2016-7-11 19:27:19 | 显示全部楼层


  6. When the Liberal Democrat Adrian Sanders says the fact that the British writers' archives ',go abroad" is "the reality of the world," (para. 3) he most probably implies that_______.
   (A) it is not well-grounded to use taxpayers' money to keep British writers' archives
   (B) the public money should be used to retain the manuscripts of these writers
   (C) the British have also bought these artifacts from artists from other countries
   (D) this kind of trading is quite normal and should not be surprising
  7. When the former culture secretary Smith said that "It won't cost the Treasury an arm and a leg--we're talking pennies, really." (para. 5) he was telling us that _______.
   (A) the Treasury should be fully responsible for the collection and maintenance of  such literary artifacts
   (B) the function of the Treasury will be like that of an arm and a leg
   (C) the Treasury should take strict and severe financial policies in dealing with the issue
   (D) the Treasury will not have any difficulty giving such funding and support
  8. Salman Rushdie, the author of the Satanic Verses,_______.
   (A) is the representative of British literary people
   (B) sold his papers including the publication of his first novel in 1975
   (C) was once protected with the taxpayers' money
   (D) mainly lives in New York as he is most welcome to American readers
  9. Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?
   (A) The campaigning group consists of 15 famous literary people.
   (B) Foreign institutions regularly charge for access to the papers by British writers.
   (C) American universities have more funding to purchase the manuscripts from British writers.
   (D) People have different opinions towards using taxpayers's money to buy back the papers.
  10. Which of the following gives the main idea of the passage?
   (A) The price of British writers' manuscripts is on the rise.
   (B) The British literary people are competing with their American rivals.
   (C) American institutions are buying British writers' literary papers.
   (D) The British are trying to stop the flow of writers' archives to America.
实习编辑:褚萍湘
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网 ( 京ICP备09058993号 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-24 18:01 , Processed in 0.087753 second(s), 7 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表