|
|
2014年10月30日,美国华盛顿邮报发表题为“Cheating concerns force delay in SAT scores for
South Koreans and
Chinese”的文章,报道中国和韩国籍考生的SAT成绩推迟公布情况。北京新东方北美部美本本地项目田甜老师就华盛顿邮报原文进行了中文翻译。
华盛顿邮报英文原文——
Cheating concerns force delay in SAT scores for South Koreans and
Chinese
Concerns about possible cheating on the SAT in Asia have led test overseers
to withhold scores for students from China and South Korea who took the college
admission exam nearly three weeks ago.
The nature and extent of the alleged security breach were unclear Thursday
because the College Board and its contractor, the Educational Testing Service,
revealed few details about the unfolding investigation. But the score-reporting
delay could affect thousands of students seeking admission to U.S. colleges as
November deadlines loom for early applications.
“Based on specific, reliable information, we have placed the scores of all
students who are current residents of Korea or China and sat for the Oct. 11
international administration of the SAT on hold while we conduct an
administrative review,” the College Board and ETS said in a joint statement.
“The review is being conducted to ensure that illegal actions by individuals or
organizations do not prevent the majority of test-takers who have worked hard to
prepare for the exam from receiving valid and accurate scores.”
An international admissions counselor and the leader of an admissions and
counseling network told The Washington Post that some students at test centers
in other Asian countries reportedly were caught checking smartphones to get
cribbed answers to SAT questions while taking the exam.
The alleged cheating cast a spotlight on a critical academic pipeline.
China and South Korea are the top two suppliers of foreign undergraduates in the
United States. There were more than 93,000 Chinese and 38,000 South Korean
undergraduates in U.S. colleges in the 2012-2013 school year, according to the
Institute of International Education.
The College Board has declined to say how many students per foreign country
take the SAT. But it is likely that most Chinese and South Korean applicants do.
For many, Oct. 11 was a key test date because it was the last administration of
the test before early applications start to come due on Nov. 1.
Matthew Lee, of Fairfax County, an education consultant for college-bound
students in Korea, said his clients were “devastated” when they heard the Oct.
11 results were delayed. Some worry that scores will be invalidated and they
will have to take the test over again.
“They worked so hard over the summer,” he said. Lee said some parents
wonder if their children should register for the test in another country, in
case colleges harbor any suspicions about scores from tests taken in South
Korea.
The College Board, a nonprofit organization based in New York, sought to
allay concerns. It said scores “will be returned as quickly as possible” in
November. “The College Board will make universities aware of the circumstances
and can supply students with a letter to share with the schools to which they
are applying,” the organization said in a statement.
At George Washington University in the District of Columbia, which recruits
heavily from China and South Korea, a senior official said that a delay in score
reporting would not disadvantage applicants from those countries. “We don't want
prospective students who've done nothing wrong to be worried about a negative
impact on their applications,” said Laurie Koehler, GWU's senior associate
provost for enrollment management.
The College Board said the SAT is given in more than 175 countries, at more
than 1,000 testing centers outside the United States. The only testing allowed
in China, officials said, is at international schools. That means Chinese
students typically go to Hong Kong or another country to take the SAT.
Scores are being withheld for all Chinese and Korean residents, according
to the College Board, regardless of where they took the test.
College Board and ETS officials said the rules for test administration are
no different whether it is given in San Francisco or Seoul. Cellphones and other
portable computing devices are prohibited, with an exception for approved
calculators during the mathematics assessment. Test proctors enforce rules,
sometimes with help from private security firms.
Exactly what prompted the investigation is unclear. The College Board/ETS
statement on Wednesday denounced “organizations that seek to illegally obtain
test materials for their own profit, to the ultimate detriment of all students.”
That indicated a concern that test questions were circulating illicitly in
advance or during the exam.
Paul Kanarek, a senior vice president for the test-preparation company
Princeton Review, which has operations in Asia, said the educational culture in
China and South Korea puts a huge premium on test scores. He said some tutors
will try any tactic, including stealing questions in advance, to help their
students get an edge. “There is enormous pressure and incentive to take
advantage by hook and by crook,” Kanarek said.
On Thursday, there were signs that test integrity questions were being
raised outside of South Korea and China.
Ffiona Rees, president of the Overseas Association for College Admission
Counseling, wrote in an e-mail:
“From what I understand from our Facebook group, there were several cases
where our members (not in China or Korea) found significant instances of student
fraud - including a student with entire pages of the SAT scanned on the phone.
The student had the entire test with answers and essay already completed.”
Joachim Ekstrom, a counselor at NIST International School in Bangkok - a
site where some Chinese visitors took the test - wrote in an e-mail that one
student was caught using an iPhone.
“Her mistake was that she checked the notes on her phone during testing,
and one of the proctors noticed it,” Ekstrom wrote. “As I searched her phone I
saw that it was full of messages including the day's 'correct' test answers for
each section.”
Tom Ewing, a spokesman for ETS, said he could not discuss specific reports
of possible cheating. He also declined to elaborate on the scope of the
investigation. “We're really not ... detailing how many students are affected,”
he said.
Michael Alison Chandler contributed to this report.
|
|