英语学习论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 331|回复: 1

2018年12月英语四级长篇阅读模拟题(八)

[复制链接]

36万

主题

36万

帖子

109万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1094809
发表于 2018-12-8 10:33:34 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  四级干货》》  作文 |阅读 |翻译 |听力
          Section B
          Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten
statements attached to it. Eachstatement contains information given in one of
the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived.
You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a
letter Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet
2.
          TV Linked to Lower Marks
          A) The effect of television on children has been debated ever since the
first sets were turned on. Now three new studies find that too much tube time
can lower test scores, retard learning and even predict college performance. The
reports appear in the July issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Ado-lescent
Medicine.
          B) In the first report, researchers studied the effect that having a TV in
a child's bedroom can have on third graders. "We looked at the household media
environment in relation to   academic achievementon mathematics, reading and
language arts tests," said study author Dina L.G. Borzekowski, an as-sistant
professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
          C) Borzekowski and her colleague, Dr. Thomas Robinson of Stanford
University, collected data on386 third graders and their parents about how much
TV the children watched, the number of TV sets, computers and video game
consoles in the household and where they were. They also collected data on how
much time the children spent using the different media, as well as the time
spent doing homework and reading. The researchers found that the media in the
household, where it is and how it is used can have a profound effect on
learning. "We found that the household media environment has a very close
association with performance on the different test scores," Borzekowski
said.
          D) "A child who has a TV in his or her bedroom is likely to have a score
that is eight points lower on a mathematics test compared to a child who doesn't
have a TV in the bedroom," she noted. These children also scored lower on the
reading and language arts tests. However, children who have ac-cess to a home
computer are likely to have higher scores on each of the tests compared with
children who don't have access to a home computer, Borzekowski noted.
          E) The reasons why TV has this negative effect are not clear, Borzekowski
said. "When there's TV in the bedroom, parents are less likely to have control
over the content and the amount watched," Borzekowski said. "They are also
unable to know how early or how late the set is on. This seems to be associated
with kids' performance on academic tests." Borzekowski believes that content and
the time the TV is on may be the primary reasons for its negative effect. "If
the TV is in the family room, then parents can see the content of what children
are watching," she said. "Parents can choose to sit alongside and watch, or turn
the set off. A simple and straightforward, positive parenting strategy is to
keep the TV out of the child's bedroom, or remove it if it's already there."
          F) In the second report, Dr. Robert J. Hancox from the University of Ot ago
in Dunedin, New Zealand, and colleagues found, regardless of your intelligence
or social background, if you watch a lot of TV during childhood, you are a lot
less likely to have a college degree by your mid-20s. In their study, the
researchers followed 1,037 people born in 1972 and 1973. Every two years,
between the ages of5 and 15, they were asked how much television they watched.
The researchers found that those who watched the most television during these
years had earned fewer degrees by the time they were 26."We found that the more
television the child had watched, the more likely they were to leave school
without any qualifications," Hancox said in a prepared statement. "Those who
watched little television had the best chance of going on to university and
earning a degree."
          G) Hancox's team found that watching TV at an early age had the most effect
on graduating from college. "An interesting finding was that although teenage
viewing was strongly linked to leaving school without any qualifications, it was
earlier childhood viewing that had the greatest impact on getting a degree," he
said. "This suggests that excessive television in younger children has a
long-lasting adverse effect on educational performance."
          H) In the third paper, Frederick J. Zimmerman and Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis
from the University of Washington report that, for very young children, watching
TV can result in lower test scores in mathematics, reading recognition and
reading comprehension. "We looked at how much television children watched before
age 3 and then at ages 3 to 5," Zimmerman said. "We found that for children who
watched a small amount of TV in the earlier years, there was co nsider able
beneficial effect compared to children who watched a lot of TV."
          I) For children aged 3 to 5, the effect was not as clear, Zimmerman said.
"There were some beneficial effects of watching TV on reading, but no beneficial
effects for math or vocabulary," he noted. "The worst pattern was to watch more
than three hours of TV before age 3. Those kids had a significant disadvantage
compared to the other kids." Parents should follow the American Academy of
Pediatrics recommendation, which is no TV for children under 2, Zimmerman said.
"Personally, I feel the cutoff should be children under 3, because there is just
not any good content for children under 3."
          J) One expert believes that TV can have both positive and negative effects,
but it all depends on what children are watching. "Content matters," said
Deborah L. Line barger, an assistant professor at the University of
Pennsylvania, who co-authored an accompanying editorial. "Educational content
has been found to be related to performance on school readiness tests, higher
grades when they are teen-agers, whereas, non-educational content tends to be
associated with lower academic performance."
          K) Another expert agrees. "TV watching takes up space that could be used by
more useful things," said Dr. Christopher P. Lucas, a clinical coordinator at
the Early Childhood Evaluation and Treatment Program at the New York University
Child Study Center. "TV is not necessarily toxic, but is some-thing that has to
be done in moderation; something that balances the other needs of the child for
healthy development."
          L) Lucas puts the responsibility for how much TV kids watch and what they
watch squarely on parents. "The amount of TV watching certainly has a link with
the reduced amount of time reading or doing homework," he said. "The key is the
amount of control parents have in limiting the amount of access. Get the TV out
of the bedroom; be aware of what is being watched; limit the amount of TV
watching."
          46. According to Borzekowski, children having chances to use a family
computer are likely to acquire better results on the different tests.
          47. The reports issued in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescents
Medicine find that watching too much TV leads to poor performance in school.
          48. Watching more than three hours of TV before age 3 has bad effect on
kids.
          49. According to the second report, the chance for one to acquire a college
degree depends on the amount of his TV watching during childhood.
          50. In Deborah L. Lingbarger's opinion, educational content is helpful for
teenagers to get better results on school readiness tests.
          51. The environment of family media greatly affects children's test scores
according to the first report.
          52. Borzekowski believes that TV's negative effect on children's marks may
mainly lie in what children watch on TV and how much time they spend on it.
          53. Lucas thinks parents should take the responsibility to supervise kids'
TV watching.
          54. According to the recommendation from American Academy of Pediatrics,
children under 2 should watch no TV.
          55. Hancox thinks earlier childhood TV watching affects one's acquiring a
college degree most.
            
            
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6880

帖子

1万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
14270
发表于 2018-12-8 11:33:41 | 显示全部楼层

          SectionB
          电视机与成绩差有关
          A.)自电视机问世以来,其对孩子的影响便一直颇具争议。【47】目前,有三项新的研究发现,看电视事假太长会导致学习成绩下降,妨碍学习进步,甚至影响在大学的成绩。这三项研究报告刊截在7月份的《儿科和青春期医学档案》杂志上。
          B)在第一份报告中,研究人员研究在三年级学生的卧室里放置电视对他们的影响。其中的一位研究人员是约翰霍普金斯大学彭博公共卫生学院的助理教授DinaL.G.Borzekowski,她表示:“我们研究的是家庭媒体环境对数学、阅读和语言艺术等科目测试成绩的影响。”
          C)Borzekowski和她的同事,斯坦福大学的Thomas
Robinson博士,调查了386位三年级学生及其父母,收集了大量关于孩子看电视花费的时间、家中的电视机、电脑和视频游戏设备的数量及其摆放位置。他们还收集了一些关于孩子在不同媒体上所花的时间和在家庭作业与阅读上所花的时间的数据。研究人员发现,家中媒体设备的摆放位置和使用方式对孩子的学习有重要的影响。【51】Borzekowski表示:“我们发现家庭媒体环境与孩子不同的测验分数的表现有密切的关系。”
          D)她表示:“卧室有电视机的孩子,其数学成绩比卧室没有电视机的孩子很可能会低8分。”而且他们的阅读和语言艺术考试成绩也相对降低。可是Borzekowski又说,【46】可以使用家庭电脑的孩子比家中没有电脑的孩子更有可能在这些科目的测试中取程更高的分数。
          E)Borzekowsk表示目前关于电视会造成这种负面影响的原因尚不明确。她说:“如果孩子的卧室有电视机,家长便不太可能控制孩子们观看的内容和时间。他们也不可能知道孩子们多早或多晚打开电视机。这似乎与孩子的学习成绩有关。”【52】
Bomekows】认为电视内容和观看的时间可能是导致电视机的负面影响的主要原因。“如果电视在客厅,那么家长便可以知道孩子所观看的内容,”她说。
“家长可以选择坐在旁边一起观看,或者将电视机关掉。一个简单、直接、有效地方式就是不要在孩子的卧室放电视机,如果已经放了,那就搬出来吧。”
       
       


       
          G)Hancox的研究团队还发现儿童时期看电视对从大学毕业的影响最大。他说:“一项有趣的发现是,虽然少年时期看电视很可能会导致没有毕业就离开学校,但是对能否取得学位影响最大的却是童年时期看电视。这表明,在童年时期,过度看电视会对学业造成长期持续的不利影响。”
          H)在第三份报告中,Frederick J.Zimmerman和来自华盛顿大学的Dimitri
A.Christakis博士认为,对于幼儿来说,看电视会导致数学、阅读认知和阅读理解的分数降低。Zimmerman表示“我们研究了孩子在3岁以前和在3到5岁之间看电视所花的时间的数量,结果发现与花许多时间看电视的孩子相比,小时候很少看电视的孩子有相当大的优势。”
       
       


       
          J)一位专家认为,电视有积极和消极的影响,而这完全取决于孩子所看的内容。宾夕法尼亚大学的助理教授Deborah
L.Linebarger曾参与编写一篇补充社论,他认为:“内容很重要。【50】教育性的内容与入学须备考试的成绩有关,有助于青少年取得更好的成绩,而非教育性的力容则往往导致学习成绩下降。”
          K)另外一位专家Christopher
P.Lucas博士也同意这一观点。他是纽约大学儿童研究中心幼儿评价与治疗计划的临床协调员,他认为:“看电视会占据用于做其他更有用的事情的时间。电视不一定有害处,但是看电视应该适度。为了孩子的健康发展,看电视要和孩子的其他需求保持平衡。”
          L)【53】Lucae认为孩子看电视的时间和内容该完全由父母负责监督。他说:“看电视的时间太长,自然就会减少阅读或做家庭作业的时间。关键在于家长要控制孩子看电视的时间。把电视从卧室里搬出来,要知道孩子观看的内容,限制看电视的时间。”
          46.According to Borzekowski,children having chances to use a family
computer are likely to acquire better re-suits on the different
tests.Borzekowski发现能接触使用家用电脑的孩子各项测试成绩一般更好。
          【解析】 D)。细节题。根据句中chancestouse afamily
computer可将答案定位于D)段最后一句话。可是Borzekowski又说,可以使用家庭电脑的孩子比家中没有电脑的孩子更有可能在这些科目的测试中取得更高的分数.
          47.The reports issued in the Archives of Pediatrics&Adolescents
Medicine find that watching too much TV leads to poor perform ancein
sch001.《儿科和青春期医学档案》杂志研究发现看电视时间太长会导致学习成绩差。
          【解析】 A)。细节题。根据句中the Archives of Pediatrics& Adolescents
Medicine可将答案定位于Al段后两句。目前,有三项新的研究发现,看电视时间太长会导致学习成绩下降,妨碍学习进步,甚至影响在大学的成绩。这三项研究报告刊载在7月份的《儿科和青春期医学档案》杂志上。
          48.Watching more than three hours of TV before age 3 has bad effect on
kids.
          三岁前每天看电视三个小时以上会对孩子产生不好的影响。
          【解析】I)。细节题。根据句中more than three hours of TV before age
3可将答案定位于I)段第三四句话。最糟糕的便是在3岁之前每天看3个小时以上的电视。与其他孩子相比,他们会有较大的劣势。
          49.According to the second report,the chance for one to acquire a college
degree depends on the amount of his TV watching during childhood.
          第二则报告显示:一个人能否获取大学学位取决于他少年期看电视的时间。
          【解析】F)。归纳题。根据句中the chance for one to acquire a college
degree可将答案定位于F)段。F段整段的中心意思就是少年期看电视越多越不容易获得大学学位,反之亦然。
          50.In Deborah L.Lingbarger’s opinion,educational content is helpful for
teenagers to get better results on school readiness tests.Deborah L.Ling
barger认为(电视上的)教育性内容可以帮助青少年在入学预备考试中取得更好的成绩。
          【解析】 J)。细节题。根据句中educational
content可将答案定位于J)段末句。内容很重要。教育性的内容与入学预备考试的成绩有关,有助于青少年取得更好的成绩,而非教育性的内容则往往导致学习成绩下降。
          51. environment of family media greatly affects children’s test Scorcs
according to the first report.
          第一则报告发现,家庭媒体环境极大地影响孩子的测试成绩。
          【解析】C)。细节题。根据句中environment of family
media可将答案定位于C)段末句。我们发现家庭媒体环境与孩子不同的测验分数的表现有密切的关系。
          52.Borzekowski believes that TV’s negative effect on children’s marks may
mainly lie in what children watch on TV and how much time they spend on it.
          Borzekowski认为电视给孩子的成绩带来负面影响,原因主要在于其收看内容和时长。
          【解析】 E)。细节题。根据句中TV’s negative
effect可将答案定位于E)段,此段整段都在探讨电视负面效应的原因。其中一句尤为点题:Borzekowskibelieves that content and
the lime the"IV is on may be the primary reasons for its negative
effect.Borzekowski认为电视内容和观看的时间可能是导致电视机的负面影响的主要原因。What children watch on TV and
how much time they spend on it是.content and the time的同类表述。
          53•Lucas thinks parents should take the responsibility to supervise kids’TV
watchin. Lucas认为父母有责任监督孩子看电视。
          【解析】 L)。细节题。根据句中parents should take the
responsibility可将答案定位于L)段首句。Lucas认为孩予看电视的时间和内容应该完全由父母负责监督。
          54.According to the
recommendation from American Academy of Peadialrics,children under 2
should watch TV.
          美国小儿科协会建议不要让两岁以下孩子看电视。
          【解析】 I)。细节题。根据句中Amcerican Academy of
Peadiatrics和under2可将答案定位于I)段倒数第二句。Zimmerman表示家长应该听从美国小儿科学会的建议,不要让2岁以下的孩子看电视。
          55.Hancox thinks earlier childhood TV watching affects one’s acquiring a
college degree most.
          Hancox认为儿童早期看电视最影响一个人能否获取大学学位。
          【解析】 G)。细节题。根据句中earlier childhood和college
degree可将答案定位于G)段第二句。一项有趣的发现是,虽然少年时期看电视很可能会导致没有毕业就离开学校,但是对能否取得学位影响最大的却是童年时期看电视。
            
            
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网 ( 京ICP备09058993号 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 21:33 , Processed in 0.091899 second(s), 7 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表