英语学习论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 203|回复: 0

10亿!索尼下血本请丹尼尔克雷格再演2部007

[复制链接]

36万

主题

36万

帖子

109万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1094809
发表于 2017-3-13 21:49:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

686aa2bb453366b96f81744de2af684523.jpg

686aa2bb453366b96f81744de2af684523.jpg

        Daniel Craig has reportedly been offered a staggering $150million by Sony bosses to shoot two more James Bond movies.据报道,索尼公司老板以1.5亿美元(约人民币10.5亿)的惊人片酬请丹尼尔·克雷格再次出演两部詹姆斯·邦德(007)电影。
        Sources tell that Sony bosses are desperate to keep Daniel in the picture for a further two films, in order to 'phase in a younger successor'.有消息指出,索尼公司老板如此迫切地希望让丹尼尔再次出演两部007电影以便“逐步引入一位更年轻的继任者”。
        Murmurs have been circulating Hollywood for some time suggesting Daniel's replacement is imminent, with many insiders tipping the likes of Idris Elba or Tom Hiddleston to nab the iconic role.有一段时间,好莱坞中一直流传着这样的消息,确定丹尼尔的继任者迫在眉睫,许多知情人士透露,像伊德瑞斯·艾尔巴或汤姆·希德勒斯顿这样的人可能会出演这位标志性的角色。
        Yet insiders claim Sony are determined to keep the first blond Bond in the role following his four turns as the spy in Casino Royale (2006), Quantum of Solace (2008), Skyfall (2012) and Spectre (2015).但是,有知情人士声称,继丹尼尔在4部007电影《皇家赌场》(2006)、《量子危机》(2008)、《大破天幕杀机》(2012)、《幽灵党》(2015)中出演这名密探之后,索尼决定要让这位第一代邦德继续出演这个角色。
        'Everyone knows how much executives adore him, and the idea of losing him at such a crucial time isn’t an option as far as all the studio honchos are concerned.’“每个人都知道有多少执行官喜欢他,就所有的制片厂老板而言,在这样一个关键时期,失去他的主意可行不通。”
        The whopping sum is said to be an incentive to lure Daniel back to the role. However, in May sources told that Daniel has thrown in the towel despite cash offerings: ' Daniel is done — pure and simple. They threw huge amounts of money at him, but it just wasn’t what he wanted'.据说,这份天价报酬是为了吸引丹尼尔继续出演这个角色。然而,5月份有消息指出,虽然有这份天价片酬,丹尼尔却放弃了:“丹尼尔已经尽了全力。他们往他身上砸大笔大笔的钱,但这却不是他想要的。”
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网 ( 京ICP备09058993号 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-8 11:59 , Processed in 0.081952 second(s), 9 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表