|
|
41. Some people think that human needs forfarmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land forendangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why orwhy not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
参考分析：
选择不同意更好写一些。列举两三个保护endangered animals的重要性。同时不要忘了说明人类也确实需要更多的土地。只不过不能只顾眼前利益(short term benefits)而已。
|
41、不同意人类对于农田、房屋和工业的需要要比保护濒危动物重要
（1）如果不保护濒危动物，那么会对环境造成巨大的破坏
（2）濒危动物的消失，会为动物学和生物学带来巨大的损失
（3）再说明人类对于农田、房屋和工业的需要也非常重要，但是保护濒危动物也是必要的。
|
Topic 41 Should land besaved for animals?
In the past, there have been many endangered animals. Nowthey are extinct. Does it matter? Has our environment been affected by theirabsence? Has the quality of our own life been changed? The answer to thesequestions is "Yes. "
It does matter if we destroy an endangered specieshabitat to develop more farmland, housing or industrial parks. There is adelicate balance of nature. If one small part is removed, it will affect allthe other parts. For example, if certain trees are cut down, bats will have noplace to roost. If they cannot roost, they cannot breed. If there are no bats,there will be no animal, or bird to eat certain insects that plague our crops.
Our environment has been affected by the absence of certainanimals. Certain flowers are pollinated by butterflies that migrate from Canada to Mexico. Some of the breedinggrounds of these butterflies were destroyed. Now these flowers are disappearingfrom certain areas. We will no longer be able to enjoy their beauty.
The quality of our life has been changed. America used tobe covered with giant trees. Now we have to visit them in one small park.Rainforests around the world are being cut down to make room for humans. Wewill never be able to see or study this fragile ecosystem.
I would encourage us humans to look for otheralternatives for our farmlands, housing, and industries. We have alternatives;the animals do not. |
|
发表于 2016-7-10 15:22:44