|
剑桥真题>Original Topic:
It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents,
for example, for sport or music; and others are not. However, it is sometimes
claimed that any child can be taught to become a sports person or musician.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
knowledge or experience.
借剑范文>Imitation Writing:
It is possible that genetics as nature and environment as nurture are not
mutually exclusive. This assumption may explain in part the different levels of
personal ability in music, art, sport and so on. In other words, good training
is as important as natural talents.
From one point of view, being born with special gifts is certainly an
advantage. What tells a difference is the innate talent which may be something
that cannot be taught, and something money cannot buy. That is to say, without
such born talent, no matter how good the teacher is or how frequently a person
practices, there is little hope for him or her to become an excellent musician,
artist, or sports player. Underlying this view is the fact that there is more to
a natural skill than a learned technique. Indeed, some people do have talents
that are probably inherited via their genes, allowing them to excel in specific
fields. In comparison, more hard-working students are likely to find it next to
impossible to reach as high a level as desired.
Nevertheless, from the other point of view, it seems that in right
environment, practice would make perfect. Hard work could make a difference in
children who are motivated to be aiming high in whatever discipline, including
music, art or sport. At school, plenty of exceptional examples are found as
evidence to support the claim that a child can acquire specific skills through
continuous training under appropriate guidance. This implies the importance of
learning with natural gifts or without. Further, it may be said that gifted
persons would remain only gifted persons if their talents were not developed
properly. Actually, the current education systems are based on the belief that
all children can be taught to learn different skills, however demanding.
As a conclusion, any child can be trained to different degrees to become
professionals, but to be really good in such areas as music, art and sport, then
probably certain talents are required. The innate ability is always a plus, but
it does not mean that the born talent is itself a guarantee for success. Nor
does it indicate that, for not being born with certain talents, people should
not at all learn particular skills. (东施范文作者猫头鹰,仿写剑桥西施原创)
>猫头鹰说:请网友参考剑桥7考官范文原文(雅思专利,不便复制)。
雅思剑桥大作文范文:IELTS Cambridge (Writing Task 2) Model Essay
猫头鹰在线写作实验室尊重雅思范文的经典权威。剑桥1-8所提供的范文值得模仿,无奈缺点找不到,优点学不到。多位考官朴实平凡的上乘作品,充分地表现老外的母语思维,出口成章。然而难以学到的是英文的修辞效率,句法变化,词汇恰当。比较容易学习到(但是未必需要模仿)的是主题的焦点,结构的组织,内容的论证。
反正写作考试没有标准答案,而却答题方法也因人而异。【东施】猫头鹰【效颦】剑桥【西施】范文。其实书上讲的明明白白——答案无限。注意到每篇剑桥范文都附上这一句话:This
model has been prepared by an examiner as an example of a very good answer.
However, please note that this is just one example out of many possible
approaches. |
|