英语学习论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 201|回复: 0

每天读一篇英语小故事:TSA’s New Policy (2)

[复制链接]

36万

主题

36万

帖子

109万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1094809
发表于 2016-7-10 09:20:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  Cher called her supervisor. He tried to explain the situation to teary-eyed
Brooke. He told her that the Transportation Security Administration couldn’t
take a chance on Brooke boarding the plane. “For all we know,” he said, “your
breast could actually be a deadly bomb in disguise. Once you get on board, all
you have to do is pull on that ring to detonate the bomb, like you would pull
the ring on a hand grenade. I'm sorry, but our motto is Better Safe than
Sorry.”
          The next day, Brooke contacted well-known Los Angeles lawyer Gloria Allred.
Allred immediately filed a lawsuit against TSA. She held a televised press
conference. “If a nipple ring might detonate a breast bomb,” Allred asked, “then
why does TSA allow wedding rings on planes? Maybe someone could pull on their
wedding ring and detonate a hand bomb! And why would a pretty young girl like
Brooke want to blow herself up? TSA is going to be sorry they made this
mistake.”
          Just two days later, TSA announced that passengers with body piercings
would no longer have to remove their jewelry, as long as they allowed TSA to
“visually inspect” all the jewelry. Also, TSA reimbursed Brooke for her original
plane ticket, bought her a round-trip first class ticket to Atlanta, and paid
her an undisclosed cash settlement.
          “This is a victory for the people,” Allred announced in a second press
conference.
          “This is a victory for TSA,” announced a TSA spokesman. “It allows us to
focus on life and death issues rather than waste our valuable time waiting for
travelers to remove all their jewelry.”
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网

GMT+8, 2025-1-22 12:11 , Processed in 0.081012 second(s), 7 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表