英语学习论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 225|回复: 1

2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题:仔细阅读

[复制链接]

36万

主题

36万

帖子

109万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1094809
发表于 2016-7-29 08:46:40 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  Part ⅣReading Comprehension(Reading in Depth)(25 minutes)
  Section A
  Directions: In this section, there is a short passage with 5 questions or incomplete statements. Read the passage carefully. Then answer the questions or complete the statements in the fewest possible words. Please write your answers on Answer sheet 2.
  Questions 47 to 51 are based on the following passage.
  Questions : My ninth-grade art teacher doesn’t give any grade above 94% because, she says,
  “There’s always room for improvement.” In previous years, I earned a 99% and a 100%. The 94 I received this term does not reflect the hard work that I put into this course. Because of her “improvement ” theory, I got a lower grade than I deserve. Is her grading philosophy ethical( 符合职业道德规范的)?
  Answer: Your teacher’s grading system may be unwise, but it is not unethical. A teacher deserves wide latitude in selecting the method of grading that best promotes learning in her classroom; that is, after all, the prime function of grades. It is she who has the training and experience to make this decision. Assuming that your teacher is neither biased nor corrupt and that her system conforms to school rules, you can’t fault her ethics.
  You can criticize her methodology. A 100 need not imply that there is no possibility of improvement, only that a student successfully completed the course work . A ninth grader could get a well-earned 100 in English class but still have a way to go before she writes as well as jane Austen. What’s more, grades are not only an educational device but are also part of a screening system to help assign kids to their next class or program. By capping her grades at 94 while most other teachers grade on a scale that tops out at 100, your teacher could jeopardize a student’s chance of getting a scholarship or getting into a top college.
  What it is wrong to condemn her for is overlooking your hard work. Your diligence is worthy of encouragement, but effort does not equal accomplishment. If scholars suddently discovered that Rembrandt had dashed off “ The Night Watch ” in an afternoon, it would still be “ The Night Watch. ” I could spend months sweating over my own “ paintings ” , but I’d produce something you would’t want to hang in your living room. Or your garage.
  One feature of a good grading system is that those measured by it generally regard it as fair and reasonable—not the case here. Simmering(难以平息的) resentment is seldom an aid to education. And so your next step should be to discuss your concerns with your teacher or the principal.
  注意:此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
  47.The ninth瞘rader thought that his art teacher should have given him .
  48.According to the answer, a teacher should have the freedom to to encourage learning.
  49.We learn from the answer that a student who gets a 100 should still work hard and keep .
  50.The example of Rembrandt’s painting suggests that a distinction should be made between .
  51.The ninth-grader is advised to go to his teacher or the principal to .
  Section B
  Directions: There are 2 passages in this section, Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A), B), C) and D).You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.
  Passage One
  Questions 52 to 56 are based on the following passage.
  Only two countries in the advanced world provide no guarantee for paid leave from work to care for a newborn child. Last spring one of the two, Australia, gave up that dubious distinction by establishing paid family leave starting in 2011. I wasn’t surprised when this didn’t make the news here in the United States—we’re now the only wealthy country without such a policy.
  The United States does have one explicit family policy, the Family and Medical Leave Act, passed in 1933. It entitles workers to as much as 12 weeks’ unpaid leave for care of a newborn or dealing with a family medical problem. Despite the modesty of the benefit, the Chamber of Commerce and other business groups fought it bitterly, describing it as “government瞨un personnel management” and a “dangerous precedent.” In fact, every step of the way, as (usually) Democratic leaders have tried to introduce work瞗amily balance measures into the law, business groups have been strongly opposed.
  As Yale law professor Anne Alstott argues, justifying parental support depends on defining the family as a social good that, in some sense, society must pay for. In her book No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents, she argues that parents are burdened in many ways in their lives: there is “no exit” when it comes to children. “Society expects—and needs—parents to provide their children with continuity of care, meaning the intensive, intimate care that human beings need to develop their intellectual, emotional, and moral capabilities. And society expects—and needs—parents to persist in their role for 18 years, or longer if needed.”
  While most parents do this out of love, there are public penalties for not providing care, What parents do, in other words, is of deep concern to the state, for the obvious reason that caring for children is not only morally urgent but essential for the future of society. The state recognizes this in the large body of family laws that govern children’s welfare, yet parents receive little help in meeting the life瞔hanging obligations society imposes. To classify parenting as a personal choice for which there is on collective responsibility is not merely to ignore the social benefits of good parenting; really, it is to steal those benefits because they accrue(不断积累)to the whole of society as today’s children become tomorrow’s productive citizenry(公民). In fact, by some estimates, the value of parental investments in children, investments of time and money (including lost wages), is equal to 20-30% of gross domestic product. If these investments generate huge social benefits—as they clearly do—the benefits of providing more social support for the family should be that much clearer.
  注意:此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
  52.What do we learn about paid family leave from the first paragraph?
  A)America is now the only developed country without the policy.
  B)It has now become a hot topic in the United States.
  C)It came as a surprise when Australia adopted the policy.
  D)Its meaning was clarified when it was established in Australia.
  53.What has prevented the passing of work瞗amily balance laws in the United States?
  A)The incompetence of the Democrats.
  B)The existing Family and Medical Leave Act.
  C)The lack of a precedent in American history.
  D)The opposition from business circles.
  54.What is Professor Anne Alstott’s argument for parental support?
  A)The cost of raising children in the U.S. has been growing.
  B)Good parenting benefits society.
  C)The U.S. should keep up with other developed countries.
  D)Children need continuous care.
  55.What does the author think of America’s large body of family laws governing children’s welfare?
  A)They fail to ensure children’s healthy growth.
  B)They fail to provide enough support for parents.
  C)They emphasize parents’ legal responsibilities.
  D)They impose the care of children on parents.
  56.Why does the author object to classifying parenting as a personal choice?
  A)It is regarded as a legal obligation.
  B)It relies largely on social support.
  C)It generates huge social benefits.
  D)It is basically a social undertaking.
  Passage Two
  Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.
  A new study from the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) at Tufts University瞫hows that today’s youth vote in larger numbers than previous generations, and a 2008 study from the Center for American Progress adds that increasing numbers of young voters and activists support traditionally liberal causes, But there’s no easy way to see what those figures mean in real life. During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama assembled a racially and ideologically diverse coalition with his message of hope and change; as the reality of life under a new administration settles in, some of those supporters might become disillusioned, As the nation moves further into the Obama presidency, will politically engaged young people continue to support the president and his agenda, or will they gradually drift away?
  The writers of Generation O(short for Obama), a new Newsweek blog that seeks to chronicle the lives of a group of young Obama supporters, want to answer that question. For the next three months, Michelle Kremer and 11 other Obama supporters, ages 19 to 34, will blog about life across mainstream America, with one twist: by tying all of their ideas and experiences to the new president and his administration, the bloggers will try to start a conversation about what it means to be young and politically active in America today. Malena Amusa, a 24瞴ear瞣ld writer and dancer from St. Louis sees the project as a way to preserve history as it happens. Amusa, who is traveling to India this spring to finish a book, then to Senegal to teach English, has ongoing conversations with her friends about how the Obama presidency has changed their daily lives and hopes to put some of those ideas, along with her global perspective, into her posts. She’s excited because, as she puts it. “I don’t have to wait[until] 15 years from now” to make sense of the world.
  Henry Flores, a political瞫cience professor at St. Mary’s University, credits this younger generation’s political strength to their embrace of technology. “[The Internet]exposes them to more thinking,” he says, “and groups that are like瞞inded in different parts of the country start to come together.” That’s exactly what the Generation O bloggers are hoping to do. The result could be a group of young people that, like their boomer(二战后生育高峰期出生的美国人)parents, grows up with a strong sense of purpose and sheds the image of apathy(冷漠)they’ve inherited from Generation X(60年代后期和70年代出生的美国人). It’s no small challenge for a blog run by a group of ordinary—if ambitious—young people, but the members of Generation O are up to the task.
  注意:此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
  57.What is the finding of a new study by CIRCLE?
  A)More young voters are going to the polls than before.
  B)The younger generation supports traditionally liberal causes.
  C)Young voters played a decisive role in Obama’s election.
  D)Young people in America are now more diverse ideologically.
  58.What is a main concern of the writers of Generation O?
  A)How Obama is going to live up to young people’s expectations.
  B)Whether America is going to change during Obama’s presidency.
  C)Whether young people will continue to support Obama’s policy.
  D)How Obama’s agenda is going to affect the life of Americans.
  59.What will the Generation O bloggers write about in their posts?
  A)Their own interpretation of American politics.
  B)Policy changes to take place in Obama’s administration.
  C)Obama’s presidency viewed from a global perspective.
  D)Their lives in relation to Obama’s presidency.
  60.What accounts for the younger generation’s political strength according to professor Henry Flores?
  A)Their embrace of radical ideas.B)Their desire to change America.
  C)Their utilization of the Internet.D)Their strong sense of responsibility.
  61.What can we infer from the passage about Generation X?
  A)They are politically conservative.B)They reject conventional values.
  C)They dare to take up challenges.D)They are indifferent to politics.
2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题:仔细阅读 摘自 2011大学英语六级考试历年真题精析(精华版)

20160517070357360.jpg

20160517070357360.jpg

        
         
         
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6910

帖子

1万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
14316
发表于 2016-7-29 09:05:36 | 显示全部楼层
   Section A
  c指点迷津
  这一部分相对来说比较简单,考查的重点在于考生对细节的把握和理解。做题的时候,一定要注意尽量使用原文,根据语法要求作必要的改动,使句子通顺、流畅。
  原文精译
  问题:
  九年级的艺术老师从不给94以上的分数,她认为,“总有进步的空间。”前几年,我得过99和100。这学期得到的94分并没有反映出我在这门课中付出的努力。【47】因为她的“进步”理论,我的分数低于我本应得到的。她的评分原则符合职业道德规范吗?
  回答:
  老师的评分体系也许不明智,但符合道德。【48】老师在选择评分方式时有很大自由度,这个评分方式最能提升课堂教学效果;这毕竟是分数的首要功能。她经过培训,有相关经历来做决定。假设老师既不偏袒也不腐败,体系符合学校规定,那你不能挑她职业道德的毛病。
  你可以批评她的方法论。【49】100分并不表明就没有进步的可能性,只表明学生成功地完成了课程。9年纪的学生在英语课上可能拿100分,但想写得像简·奥斯汀那么好,还需要更多的努力。再者,分数不仅仅是教育手段,还是过滤体系的一部分,帮助安排孩子下一学期的课程或科目。她的最高分是94,而其他老师的最高分是100,你的老师可能降低学生得到奖学金或进入好大学的机会。
  谴责她忽视你的努力,这是错误的。【50】你的勤奋值得鼓励,但努力不等于成就。如果学者突然发现,伦勃朗一下午就匆促写出了“The Night Watch”,它依然是著名的“The Night Watch”。我可能花了数月来修改自己的“油画”,但我的作品,你肯定不愿意挂在客厅里,甚至是车库里。
  好评分体系的特点之一是,由这个评分体系评估的人们,认为它公平合理——这里的例子并非如此。难以平息的愤恨对教育并无多大帮助。【51】所以,你接下来要做的是,和你的老师或校长讨论你的看法。
  文章主题:本篇文章采取提问、回答的形式,比较新颖,重点突出。文章主要讨论了一位教师的评分体系。从学生的质疑出发,作者讨论了评分体系的主要目的,这种评分体系可能带来的危险,并建议学生的下一步行为。
  47.【答案】a grade above 94/a higher grade
  【解析】根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第一段。第一段中讲:因为她的“进步”理论,我的分数低于我本应得到的。也就是说,这个学生认为他本应得到比94分还要高的分数。
  48.【答案】select the method of grading
  【解析】根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第二段。段中的原文为:A teacher deserves wide latitude in selecting the method of grading that best promotes learning in her classroom。题目中的have the freedom和原文中的deserve wide latitude意义相近;encourage learning与promote learning表意相似。原句使用了动词的分词形式,而此处to后面用动词原形select。
  49.【答案】improving
  【解析】根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第三段。段中的原文为:A 100 need not imply that there is no possibility of improvement,意为“拿到100分的学生仍需要进步”。题目中keep后需接动词的ing形式,因此答案为improving。
  50.【答案】effort and accomplishment
  【解析】根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第四段。段首是作者的观点:What it is wrong to condemn her for is overlooking your hard work. Your diligence is worthy of encouragement, but effort does not equal accomplishment;然后作者用Rembrandt为例,来支持自己的观点,强调努力不等同于成就。题目中的distinction意为“区别”,作者在这里强调要区别effort和accomplishment。
  51.【答案】discuss his concerns
  【解析】根据题干,考生可锁定文章的最后一段。文章的最后一句为:And so your next step should be to discuss your concerns with your teacher or the principal。
  Section B
  c指点迷津
  这一部分的阅读理解主要考查考生对文章的深层次理解,对细节的把握和进一步理解。做题时,考生要定位准确,注意联系上下文,运用逻辑的推理方式,达到最合理的结论。
  Passage One
  原文精译
  【52】发达国家中只有两个不提供带薪休假,来照顾新生婴儿。去年春天,其中之一的澳大利亚从2011年开始实施家庭带薪休假计划,放弃这与众不同的区别。在美国这并没有成为新闻,我并不奇怪——现在我们国家是唯一一个没有这种政策的发达国家。
  美国确实有明确的家庭政策,1933年通过的the Family and Medical Leave Act。它规定工人最多有12周的无薪假期,来照顾新生婴儿,或处理其他家庭医疗问题。尽管有一定好处,但商会和其他商业组织,和它艰苦对抗,认为它是“政府经营的人力资源管理”和“危险的先例”。其实,这每一步,【53】只要民主党派领导人想将工作—家庭的平衡政策引入法律体系,商业组织就会强烈反对。
  【54】耶鲁的法律教授安妮·沃斯托特争论说,为支持父母找正当理由,那就是把家庭作为社会产品,某种意义上,社会必须付钱购买。在她的著作No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents中,她认为,父母一生都有负担:谈到孩子问题,他们根本没有出路。“社会期待——也需要——父母为孩子提供持续的照顾,也就是精细的、亲密的照顾,人类需要这个来发展自己的智力、情感、道德潜能。社会期待——也需要——父母18年来坚持付出爱,如果有需要比18年还要长。”
  大部分父母因爱而付出,如果不付出关爱,将会公开惩罚。也就是说,父母所作的事情,对国家来说意义重大,最明显的原因是,教养孩子不仅仅在道德上很迫切,而且对社会的未来至关重要。【55】国家在负责儿童福利的家庭法律中意识到了这一点,社会为父母强加了能改变他们生活的责任,却未能给他们提供多少帮助。【56】把家庭教育定位为个人选择,社会没有共同责任,并不是仅仅忽略了良好家庭教育带来的社会利益;实际上,它窃取了这些利益,因为对整个社会来讲,利益可以积累,今天的孩子会成为明天颇有成就的公民。事实上,有人估计,父母对孩子投资的价值,时间
  和金钱方面的投资(包括失去的薪水),相当于国民生产总值的20%到30%。如果这些投资带来巨大社会效益——也确实带来了巨大效益——为父母提供社会支持的好处,也清楚明了得多。
  文章主题:本篇文章主要讨论了谁该为家庭教育买单。作者认为,家庭教育不应该只是个人选项,良好的教育给社会带来了丰厚的效益。从这个角度出发,社会应提供各方面的支持,和父母共同努力,为社会的未来发展培养孩子。
  52.What do we learn about paid family leave from the first paragraph?
  A)America is now the only developed country without the policy.
  B)It has now become a hot topic in the United States.
  C)It came as a surprise when Australia adopted the policy.
  D)Its meaning was clarified when it was established in Australia.
  52.A)本题是个细节判断题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第一段。第一段段末,作者提及,在美国这并没有成为新闻,我并不奇怪——现在我们国家是唯一一个没有这种政策的发达国家。由此考生可判断A为正确答案。
  53.What has prevented the passing of work瞗amily balance laws in the United States?
  A)The incompetence of the Democrats.
  B)The existing Family and Medical Leave Act.
  C)The lack of a precedent in American history.
  D)The opposition from business circles.
  53.D)本题是个细节推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第二段。第二段段末,作者提及,只要民主党派领导人想将工作—家庭的平衡政策引入法律体系,商业组织就会强烈反对。由此,考生可推理,阻止相关法律的是商业组织。
  54.What is Professor Anne Alstott’s argument for parental support?
  A)The cost of raising children in the U.S. has been growing.
  B)Good parenting benefits society.
  C)The U.S. should keep up with other developed countries.
  D)Children need continuous care.
  54.B)本题是个细节推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第三段。第三段中提到法律教授安妮·沃斯托特的主要观点:把家庭作为社会产品,某种意义上,社会必须付钱购买。随后作者讲到社会希望父母给孩子带来关爱,而孩子长大后会给社会带来利益。由此可以推理,良好的家庭教育有利于社会。
  55.What does the author think of America’s large body of family laws governing children’s welfare?
  A)They fail to ensure children’s healthy growth.
  B)They fail to provide enough support for parents.
  C)They emphasize parents’ legal responsibilities.
  D)They impose the care of children on parents.
  55.B)本题是个细节题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第四段。第四段中,作者提及,国家在负责儿童福利的家庭法律中意识到了这一点,社会为父母强加了能改变他们生活的责任,却未能给他们提供多少帮助。所以说,这些法律并没有给父母提供多少支持。
  56.Why does the author object to classifying parenting as a personal choice?
  A)It is regarded as a legal obligation.
  B)It relies largely on social support.
  C)It generates huge social benefits.
  D)It is basically a social undertaking.
  56.D)本题是个细节推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第四段。段中讲,把家庭教育定位为个人选择,社会没有共同责任,并不是仅仅忽略了良好家庭教育带来的社会利益;实际上,它窃取了这些利益。也就是说,教育孩子不仅仅是父母的事情,它是社会的事情,需要社会的共同努力。选项D中的social undertaking意为“社会事业”。
  Passage Two
  原文精译
  来自塔夫茨大学的the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) 的最新研究表明,【57】目前年轻人投票的人数比过去要多。2008年来自the Center for American Progress的调查附和,越来越多的年轻投票人和积极分子支持传统意义上的自由事业。但很难看到这些数字在现实生活中的意义。总统竞选期间,巴拉克·奥巴马传达了希望和变化的信息,在不同种族、不同思想观点之间建立了联盟;新一届政府正式入住白宫,某些支持者可能大失所望。【58】美国在奥巴马当政期间,热衷政治的年轻人会继续支持总统和他的做法吗?他们会慢慢远离奥巴马吗?
  【58】Generation O (O是Obama的简称)是新闻周刊的一个博客,博主想通过时间记录支持奥巴马的一群年轻人的生活,试图回答这一问题。随后三个月,米歇尔·克雷曼和其他11个支持奥巴马的年轻人,从19岁到34岁年龄不一,【59】他们通过博客来记录美国主流社会生活,其中有个转折点:把他们的想法、经历和新总统以及他的行政结合起来,试图讨论当代美国中年轻、政治上很积极到底意味着什么。马利娜·阿穆沙来自圣路易斯,24岁,作家兼舞蹈家,认为这是记录历史的方法。阿穆沙,春天去印度旅行来完成自己的新书,随后到塞内加尔教英语,【59】她一直和朋友交流,讨论奥巴马政府如何改变日常生活,希望能把其中某些观点,以及自己的全球视角,写入专栏中。她很激动,就像她所说的,“从现在起不需要等15年”才觉得这个世界有意义。
  亨利·弗洛里斯是圣玛丽大学的政治学教授,【60】认为年轻一代的政治力量来源于对科技的接纳。他说:“网络让他们接触到更多想法,全国各地想法相似的团体可以聚在一起。”这刚好是O时代的博主希望做的事情。【61】结果,这一群年轻人的父母出生在二战后生育高峰期,而年轻人成长过程中有很强烈的方向感,摆脱了他们从60年代后期和70年代出生的美国人那里继承的冷漠。对一批普通的——如果说雄心壮志的——年轻人来讲,管理这个博客并不是个小挑战,而O时代的成员决定完成任务。
  文章主题:本篇文章主要了美国年轻人对政治的热衷。作者从他们对奥巴马的支持出发,讨论这些年轻人将通过博客的形式记录奥巴马政府对美国人日常生活的影响,显示了他们对政治的关注。
  57.What is the finding of a new study by CIRCLE?
  A)More young voters are going to the polls than before.
  B)The younger generation supports traditionally liberal causes.
  C)Young voters played a decisive role in Obama’s election.
  D)Young people in America are now more diverse ideologically.
  57.A)本题是个细节题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第一段。段中提及:目前年轻人投票的人数比过去要多。而选项B是个干扰项,它所讨论的是the Center for American Progress的调查结果。
  58.What is a main concern of the writers of Generation O?
  A)How Obama is going to live up to young people’s expectations.
  B)Whether America is going to change during Obama’s presidency.
  C)Whether young people will continue to support Obama’s policy.
  D)How Obama’s agenda is going to affect the life of Americans.
  58.C)本题是个细节判断题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第一段段末和第二段段首。第二段一开始,作者提及:Generation O(O是Obama的简称)是新闻周刊的一个博客,博主想通过时间记录支持奥巴马的一群年轻人的生活,试图回答这一问题。考生要回头看这一问题到底是什么,它指代的是第一段段末的问题:热衷政治的年轻人会继续支持总统和他的做法吗?他们会慢慢远离奥巴马吗?由此可判断,选项C为正确答案。
  59.What will the Generation O bloggers write about in their posts?
  A)Their own interpretation of American politics.
  B)Policy changes to take place in Obama’s administration.
  C)Obama’s presidency viewed from a global perspective.
  D)Their lives in relation to Obama’s presidency.
  59.D)本题是个细节推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第二段。段中讲:把他们的想法、经历和新总统以及他的行为政绩结合起来,试图讨论当代美国中年轻、政治上很积极到底意味着什么。其中以马利娜·阿穆沙为例,讨论奥巴马政府如何改变日常生活。由此考生可推理,他们博客中所写的内容主要是新总统和他的政府会如何影响人民的生活。因此D为正确选项。
  60.What accounts for the younger generation’s political strength according to professor Henry Flores?
  A)Their embrace of radical ideas.B)Their desire to change America.
  C)Their utilization of the Internet.D)Their strong sense of responsibility.
  60.C)本题是个细节题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第三段。段中提及教授Henry Flores的观点:网络让他们接触到更多想法,全国各地想法相似的团体可以聚在一起。因此本题选C。
  61.What can we infer from the passage about Generation X?
  A)They are politically conservative.B)They reject conventional values.
  C)They dare to take up challenges.D)They are indifferent to politics.
  61.D)本题是个细节推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第三段。第三段段末,作者提及:摆脱了他们从60年代后期和70年代出生的美国人那里继承的冷漠。而考生从一开始就可以看到,这群年轻人非常热衷政治,由此可判断,此句中的冷漠指的是“对政治的漠不关心”。选项D中的indifferent意为“冷漠,漠不关心”,和原文中apathy同义。
2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题:仔细阅读 摘自 2011大学英语六级考试历年真题精析(精华版)
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网

GMT+8, 2025-2-25 04:23 , Processed in 0.069426 second(s), 9 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表