英语学习论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 143|回复: 0

“祝你生日快乐”歌词没有版权

[复制链接]

36万

主题

36万

帖子

109万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
1094809
发表于 2016-8-8 08:56:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

c6e5c0306433433eb4a3dcf14ae6a46735.jpg

c6e5c0306433433eb4a3dcf14ae6a46735.jpg

       

1425b56ab8d04379ba46b518c513262135.jpg

1425b56ab8d04379ba46b518c513262135.jpg

        http://f1.w.hjfile.cn/doc/201512/bbc_me_happy_birthday_report_download021295365.mp3
        文字稿
        歌曲“祝你生日快乐”中的歌词版权被美国法官裁决无效。这意味公众不再需要缴纳版权费。这支人人会唱的歌曲是由来自美国的希尔两姐妹( Mildred and Patty Hill )于 1893 年创作的。以下是 Anthony Birchley 的报道。
        Happy Birthday To You is the most recognised song in the English language. The melody was composed by two sisters in Kentucky in 1893. Their song evolved into Happy Birthday and was first copyrighted by the Summy Company in 1935. Warner/Chappell bought the rights in 1988 and has been receiving around $2m in royalties a year ever since.
        Two filmmakers planning a documentary about the song brought the legal challenge when Warner/Chappell demanded a fee for its use. They argued as the song was in the public domain, it shouldn't be subject to fees. A judge has now ruled that the Summy Company only ever acquired copyright to the melody, and not the lyrics, and as such, Warner/Chappell don't own the rights.
        词汇表
        recognised 被识别出的
        royalties 版权费
        documentary 纪录片
        brought the legal challenge (就版权问题向法庭)提出法律疑问
        in the public domain 属于公众所有,不受版权保护
        melody 歌曲
        lyrics 歌词
        测验
        请听报道并回答下列问题。
        1. Who created the famous song heard at birthday parties all over the world?
        2. According to the report, who got $2m a year from the song?
        3. True or false? The documentary makers sued the company which wanted money from them for the use of the song.
        4. Which two parts of a song are mentioned in the article?
        答案
        1. Who created the famous song heard at birthday parties all over the world?
        Two sisters - Mildred and Patty Hill - from Kentucky, US.
        2. According to the report, who got $2m a year from the song?
        Warner/Chappell.
        3. True or false? The documentary makers sued the company which wanted money from them for the use of the song.
        True. Filmmakers brought a legal challenge when Warner/Chappell demanded money to allow them to use the song.
        4. Which two parts of a song are mentioned in the article?
        Melody and lyrics.
       

96d23c9b2d084a4e8c878ed4f9937b9035.jpg

96d23c9b2d084a4e8c878ed4f9937b9035.jpg
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|新都网

GMT+8, 2025-9-24 23:07 , Processed in 0.071574 second(s), 10 queries , WinCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表