|
|
我们为什么要工作?如果是想要赚钱，那就是最世俗的回答了。因为我们忽略了我们作为人类最大的特质，就是创造力和有思想。为什么工业革命之父亚当斯密曾说：在流水线工作的人会变得很笨，笨到人类的极点?因为他相信人类需要制度，通过薪酬的方式把人们变成要满足制度需要的人，剥夺了人们的创造机会。所以人们不应该被设计活在别人的概念里而忽略自己本身的人性。
TED演讲文本：
0:11
Today I'm going to talk about work. And the question I want to ask and
answer is this: "Why dowe work?" Why do we drag ourselves out of bed every
morning instead of living our lives justfilled with bouncing from one TED-like
adventure to another?
0:31
(Laughter)
0:33
You may be asking yourselves that very question. Now, I know of course, we
have to make aliving, but nobody in this room thinks that that's the answer to
the question, "Why do we work?"For folks in this room, the work we do is
challenging, it's engaging, it's stimulating, it's meaningful.And if we're
lucky, it might even be important.
0:54
So, we wouldn't work if we didn't get paid, but that's not why we do what
we do. And in general, Ithink we think that material rewards are a pretty bad
reason for doing the work that we do. Whenwe say of somebody that he's "in it
for the money," we are not just being descriptive.
(http://open.163.com/movie/2015/9/Q/G/MB2A0K1HE_MB2K9TTQG.html)
1:12
(Laughter)
1:13
Now, I think this is totally obvious, but the very obviousness of it raises
what is for me anincredibly profound question. Why, if this is so obvious, why
is it that for the overwhelmingmajority of people on the planet, the work they
do has none of the characteristics that get us upand out of bed and off to the
office every morning? How is it that we allow the majority of peopleon the
planet to do work that is monotonous, meaningless and soul-deadening? Why is it
that ascapitalism developed, it created a mode of production, of goods and
services, in which all thenonmaterial satisfactions that might come from work
were eliminated? Workers who do this kindof work, whether they do it in
factories, in call centers, or in fulfillment warehouses, do it for pay.There is
certainly no other earthly reason to do what they do except for pay.
2:14
So the question is, "Why?" And here's the answer: the answer is technology.
Now, I know, I know-- yeah, yeah, yeah, technology, automation screws people,
blah blah -- that's not what I mean.I'm not talking about the kind of technology
that has enveloped our lives, and that people cometo TED to hear about. I'm not
talking about the technology of things, profound though that is.I'm talking
about another technology. I'm talking about the technology of ideas. I call it,
"ideatechnology" -- how clever of me.
2:49
(Laughter)
2:51
In addition to creating things, science creates ideas. Science creates ways
of understanding. And inthe social sciences, the ways of understanding that get
created are ways of understandingourselves. And they have an enormous influence
on how we think, what we aspire to, and how weact.
3:11
If you think your poverty is God's will, you pray. If you think your
poverty is the result of yourown inadequacy, you shrink into despair. And if you
think your poverty is the result of oppressionand domination, then you rise up
in revolt. Whether your response to poverty is resignation orrevolution, depends
on how you understand the sources of your poverty. This is the role thatideas
play in shaping us as human beings, and this is why idea technology may be the
mostprofoundly important technology that science gives us.
3:50
And there's something special about idea technology, that makes it
different from the technologyof things. With things, if the technology sucks, it
just vanishes, right? Bad technology disappears.With ideas -- false ideas about
human beings will not go away if people believe that they're true.Because if
people believe that they're true, they create ways of living and institutions
that areconsistent with these very false ideas.
4:25
And that's how the industrial revolution created a factory system in which
there was really nothingyou could possibly get out of your day's work, except
for the pay at the end of the day. Becausethe father -- one of the fathers of
the Industrial Revolution, Adam Smith -- was convinced thathuman beings were by
their very natures lazy, and wouldn't do anything unless you made it worththeir
while, and the way you made it worth their while was by incentivizing, by giving
themrewards. That was the only reason anyone ever did anything. So we created a
factory systemconsistent with that false view of human nature. But once that
system of production was in place,there was really no other way for people to
operate, except in a way that was consistent withAdam Smith's vision. So the
work example is merely an example of how false ideas can create acircumstance
that ends up making them true.
5:22
It is not true that you "just can't get good help anymore." It is true that
you "can't get good helpanymore" when you give people work to do that is
demeaning and soulless. And interestinglyenough, Adam Smith -- the same guy who
gave us this incredible invention of mass production,and division of labor --
understood this. He said, of people who worked in assembly lines, of menwho
worked in assembly lines, he says: "He generally becomes as stupid as it is
possible for ahuman being to become." Now, notice the word here is "become." "He
generally becomes asstupid as it is possible for a human being to become."
Whether he intended it or not, what AdamSmith was telling us there, is that the
very shape of the institution within which people workcreates people who are
fitted to the demands of that institution and deprives people of theopportunity
to derive the kinds of satisfactions from their work that we take for
granted.
6:28
The thing about science -- natural science -- is that we can spin fantastic
theories about thecosmos, and have complete confidence that the cosmos is
completely indifferent to our theories.It's going to work the same damn way no
matter what theories we have about the cosmos. Butwe do have to worry about the
theories we have of human nature, because human nature will bechanged by the
theories we have that are designed to explain and help us understand
humanbeings.
7:02
The distinguished anthropologist, Clifford Geertz, said, years ago, that
human beings are the"unfinished animals." And what he meant by that was that it
is only human nature to have ahuman nature that is very much the product of the
society in which people live. That humannature, that is to say our human nature,
is much more created than it is discovered. We designhuman nature by designing
the institutions within which people live and work.
7:36
And so you people -- pretty much the closest I ever get to being with
masters of the universe --you people should be asking yourself a question, as
you go back home to run your organizations.Just what kind of human nature do you
want to help design?
7:53
Thank you.
|
|
发表于 2016-7-12 22:07:10