美无人机反恐引争议
美国利用无人机对部分国家进行以反恐为名义的军事打击，因此引发大量法律问题。那么，一国对另一国进行军事打击究竟需要哪些条件？一起来看一看。Hints:
Pakistan
Yemen
South Downs
Sussex
United Nations Security Council
UN Charter
Afghanistan/Afghan
NATO
al-Qaeda
Taliban
Hina Shamsi
Civil Liberties Union
主持：fancyfrances
校对&翻译&注解：Ranzzy
答疑：唔哈哈哈哈哈哈
点评：lsy34
口语节目地址：http://bulo.hujiang.com/group/topic/739339/
http://t1.g.hjfile.cn/listen/201303/201303050519265888426.mp3Let's go on to "drone" strikes now. From a legal point of view, it really shouldn't matter whether an aircraft is piloted remotely or in the traditional way, but the increasing use of "drones" is raising a host of important legal issues.
As you heard, we're trying a thought experiment on this week's programme. If it's legal for the United States to kill suspected terrorists in countries, such as Pakistan and Yemen, would it be legal for another state to kill any terror suspect it might find driving around the South Downs in Sussex? So when are you allowed to use force?
One way is if the United Nations Security Council says you can. Chapter Seven of the UN Charter allows Security Council to take such action as is necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. That's the basis for military action in Afghanistan where the Afghan government is supported in its battle against the Taliban by NATO-led forces.
But what if there's no UN resolution? How can the United States use lethal force against al-Qaeda terrorists in countries where there are no active hostilities? If Yemen or Pakistan, why not Sussex?
Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union in New York.
To start off, we must acknowledge that both international law and the US Constitution permits the use of lethal force in exceptional circumstances. So outside the context among conflict, lethal force may be used in response to a specific concrete and imminent threat as a last resort.我们接着来关注无人驾驶机空袭事件。从法律的角度来说，飞机不论是通过遥控飞行还是通过传统方式飞行，这都不重要，但是无人驾驶机日益广泛的使用却引发了许多重大的法律问题。
如你所闻，我们正尝试在本周的节目上进行一次假想试验。假如美国在诸如巴基斯坦和也门这样的国家杀死可疑恐怖分子是合法的话，那么，其他国家如果发现了开车行驶在苏塞克斯南部丘陵的可疑恐怖分子并将其杀死也是合法的吗？所以什么时候才允许使用武力呢？
一种途径就是获得如果联合国安理会批准。联合国宪章第七章表明，允许安理会在必要的情况下采取行动以维护或恢复世界的和平与安全。这也是阿富汗军事行动的基础，在那里，阿富汗政府在与塔利班的斗争中得到了北约军队的支援。
但是如果没有得到联合国的决议呢？美国怎么可以在没有实际敌对行为的国家使用致命武器反对基地组织恐怖分子呢？如果在也门和巴基斯坦都可以，为什么在苏塞克斯不可以？
来听听来自纽约美国民权同盟的希娜·莎姆西怎么说。
首先，我们必须承认国际法和美国宪法都允许在特殊情况下使用致命武器。所以在战争中，致命武器可以当做是遇到特殊、具体而又紧急威胁的情况下使出的最后杀手锏。
页:
[1]